The Interesting part of the court is the interrogation. In there, the Judge, the Witness, and the Defendant negotiate and distribute the information about the case. Based on the reason above, the writer wanted to know about which exchange structure occurred the most in the interrogations of the Judge and the Witness and the Defendant. To answer those statements, she used the theory of exchange and move. For the methodology, she used qualitative approach to collect the data and focus the analysis of it, which is the interrogation in a small case, armed robbery. By dividing the data and analyzing it by the theories, it has been found that the I R F
exchange occurs mostly. The Judge does the [Initiation] and [Follow-up], and the Witness and the Defendant do [Response]. In conclusion, the most occurance of the I R F exchange shows a suggestion that, the Judge, who does the [Initiation], must do the [Follow-up] after receiving the [Response] of the Witness and the Defendant.
Author
(11491124) FARDIANA NUGRAHANI
Contributor
(94-029) Aylanda Hidayati Dwi Nugroho
(94-013) Julia Eka Rini
Publisher
Universitas Kristen Petra
Year : 2000
Subject
1. DISCOURSE ANALYSIS
Keyword
interrogation, judge, witness, defendant
Category
s1 - Skripsi/Undergraduate Thesis (Program Studi Sastra Inggris S-1)
Language
English
Rights
Undergraduate Thesis No. 773; Fardiana Nugrahani (11491124)
The resource(s) is/are owned by the Creator/Contributor.Reproduction & distribution for non-commercial purposes is permitted provided that the credit for the Creator/Contributor and the source are explicitly stated,and no alteration are made